Stenholm, Charles W., 1938-? To Congressman Carlos J. Moorhead
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC09613.01.12 Author/Creator: Stenholm, Charles W., 1938-? Place Written: Washington, District of Columbia Type: Typed letter signed Date: 18 November 1991 Pagination: 1 p. : Height: 27.8 cm, Width: 21.6 cm Order a Copy
A thank you letter from Charles Stenholm, the House representative for Texas's seventeenth district, to Moorhead for his support on a substitution to the family medical leave act. The substitution that Stenholm put forth did not pass, but would have provided a statutory hiring preference to workers who leave their jobs to fulfill family responsibilities. According to Stenholm this would include leaving the workforce for 6 years to care for a new child, and up to 2 years for a seriously ill family member. When the worker wished to return to the workforce they would be reinstated if a position of similar pay and status was available. If there was no position they would be entitled to the first position that came available within a year as long as they were qualified for it. Stenholm also mentions that his substitute was the only one that didn't mandate an employment benefit. This letter is on Stenholm's House of Representative stationery.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.