Laughton, Joseph B., fl. 1838-1865 to John H. Laughton
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC08654 Author/Creator: Laughton, Joseph B., fl. 1838-1865 Place Written: Richmond, Virginia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 5 July 1862 Pagination: 2 p. : envelope Height: 21.5 cm, Width: 13.3 cm Order a Copy
Laughton, a Union soldier from New York taken prisoner at Libby Prison, writes about being captured on 3 July 1862. Reports that conditions are fairly good at the prison and he can finally rest from the fatigues of the campaign. "I was surprised to see how kindly they welcomed me & I must say that without any exception I have been used with respect by all - We get as good bread & meat as I could wish & are used as if we were their own people." States that the way he is treated is very different than what he was led to believe in the North, and that " ... if I ever get home again I shall look at things in a different light than I have!!" Asks him to write to his wife and to a man named Jim Dunlap in Brooklyn, New York. On page two there is a note signed John, most likely his brother, the recipient of the letter, asking Bill, possibly another brother, to send this letter on to their mother. Envelope addressed to his brother in Hardford, Connecticut.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.