Nanfan, John, fl. 1688-1702 to Robert Livingston re: Parliamentary hearing on Capt. Kidd's Commission
Order a pdf of this item here.
A high-resolution version of this object is available for registered users. LOG IN
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC03107.00599 Author/Creator: Nanfan, John, fl. 1688-1702 Place Written: New York, New York Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 1700/02/20 Pagination: 3 p. : address : Height: 30.1 cm, Width: 19.7 cm Order a Copy
Nanfan writes to forward news of the Parliamentary hearings discussing the Commission of Captain Kidd. According to Nanfan, who includes a transcribed copy of the minutes of the Parliamentary Committee detailed to investigate this Commission, the Earl of Bellomont was charged and testified in the case. Bellomont, in Nanfan's words, "was cleared by a very great majority consequently with a great deal of honnour." The issue of Major John Schuyler's military excursion to Canada was raised, with Nanfan reminding Livingston of the illegality of "transportation of horses and mares to Cannada without order." Finally, Nanfan writes that "I cannot but remind you pray lett no encouragement be wanting to our Indians" in an effort to prevent the French from gaining influence and powerful allies in the region. Docketed on address leaf.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.