Ratifying the US Constitution: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists and the State Debates, 1787-1788

Ratifying the Constitution: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists and the State Debates

Lesson by Tim Bailey

Essay by Denver Brunsman, The George Washington University

Grade Level: 7–12
Number of Class Periods: 5
Primary Era: The New Nation, 1783–1815

About This Lesson Plan Unit

Cover Image of Lesson Plan Featuring George Washington and Statesmen
The five lessons in this unit explore how policymakers from different states understood the benefits and liabilities of a new federal constitution. Students will read from the Federalist Papers, Antifederalist Papers, and correspondence. You will assess students’ understanding through critical thinking questions and performed debates scripted by students.
 

Lesson Plan Author: Tim Bailey
Historical Background Essay by: Denver Brunsman, The George Washington University

Download Lesson

Additional Information About This Unit

Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.2: Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. 

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.3: Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. 

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.8.1: Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. 

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. 

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.8.1: Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. 

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.

Essential Questions

Essential Questions

According to political essayists, what were the strongest arguments in favor of a new federal constitution? 

According to political essayists, what were the strongest arguments against a federal constitution? 

How did people show or share their political beliefs? 

How did Americans with strong political opinions attempt to sway one another?

Documents

Documents

Excerpts from Federalist Papers #1, #10, #51, and #84, The Federalist: A Collection of Essays, Written in Favour of the New Constitution, as Agreed upon by the Federal Convention, September 17, 1787

Excerpts from Anti-Federalist Papers #1, #9, #46, and #84 printed in The Antifederalist Papers, Morton Borden, ed.

Resolution of Congress Forwarding the Constitution to the States for Ratification, September 28, 1787

A Letter from John Peirce to Henry Knox, November 12, 1787

John Hancock on the Need for Constitutional Amendments, ca. August 1788

Report of a Brawl between Federalists and Anti-Federalists on July 4, 1788, Freeman’s Journal or, the North-American Intelligencer (Philadelphia), July 16, 1788