Clinton, DeWitt, 1769-1828 [Depositions of Andrew Bartholomew & Arthur H. Roorbach]
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC04332 Author/Creator: Clinton, DeWitt, 1769-1828 Place Written: New York, New York Type: Document signed Date: 13 December 1813 Pagination: 3 p. : Height: 33 cm, Width: 19.9 cm Order a Copy
Clinton's written summary of the depositions of Andrew Bartholomew & Arthur Roorbach, both steamboat captains employed by Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston. Also includes a statement by Clinton certifying that the depositions are true. The depositions relate to the length of service of these two men and the kind of work they have been doing. Both men state they have captained steamboats for Fulton for almost three years and claim they have towed many boats during this time. These depositions seem to be part of an attempt by Fulton to establish that he was the first to employ steamboats for towing in New York. John L. Sullivan of Boston was attacking Fulton's patent "for towing boats and warping them over rapids by means of their engines," and he may have hoped to use these depositions as a means of defending himself. DeWitt Clinton was Mayor of New York City, later governor of New York State, and also a friend of both Fulton and Livingston.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.