United States. Supreme Court [Supplemental brief from the United States Supreme Court regarding Brown v. Board of Education]
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC05160 Author/Creator: United States. Supreme Court Place Written: Washington, District of Columbia Type: Pamphlet Date: 1953 Pagination: 1 v. : 188 p. ; 23.5 x 15. 5 cm. Order a Copy
Brief prepared on behalf of the United States for reargument by Attorney General Herbert Brownell, J. Lee Rankin, Philip Elman, and other attorneys at the Justice Department. Devoted to information regarding the case of Oliver Brown, et. al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, Shawnee County, Kansas, et. al. Title mentions four other cases. Includes a preface discussing the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to its effect on racial segregation in public schools. Contains five sections exploring the limits of judicial power in deciding the constitutionality of racial segregation in public schools. Discusses public education during and after the reconstruction period and the history and debates surrounding the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. Also outlines "actions, federal and state, bearing on school segregation," that were discussed by the legislature during and after the passage of the Amendments. Cites related cases in the index, which precedes the content of the brief. First edition. [188 p. + 2 collateral items]
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.