Marshall, John, 1755-1835 to Rufus King
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC05789 Author/Creator: Marshall, John, 1755-1835 Place Written: Washington, District of Columbia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: February 26, 1801 Pagination: 3 p. : docket ; Height: 25.4 cm, Width: 20.7 cm Order a Copy
Written by Marshall as Secretary of State to King as American Minister to Britain. Includes extract of a letter from Fitzsimmons to Secretary of Navy Benjamin Stoddert, to give King an idea of recent conduct of British Admiralty Courts in America. The extract is not included here. Claims that Sir Robert Liston, British Minister to the United States, is doing all he can "to check the piratical system" of seizures and impressment. Says Mr. Thornton, in the absence of the British charge d'affairs, hopes to limit the damages between Britain and the United States. Marshall wants to believe him, but is skeptical and says "The British courts of Vice Admiralty appear organized for the purpose of legalizing plunder." Says America needs assurances from Cabinet in London. Expresses anger that British are refusing American trade with Spanish colonies, but Marshall is unwilling to give instructions since Jefferson is about to be inaugurated. Says King should make "serious remonstrances" against British actions and await documents to back up claims. Encloses letter from Martha Washington to Sir John Sinclair that he hopes King will forward. That letter is not included.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.