Davis, Jefferson, 1808-1889 to Frank H. Alfriend
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC05344.01 Author/Creator: Davis, Jefferson, 1808-1889 Place Written: Montreal, Canada Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 17 August 1867 Pagination: 8 p. : envelope Height: 25.3 cm, Width: 19.8 cm Order a Copy
Noted at top "Strictly Confidential." Discusses events of 1850, 1857-8-9 and 1860-61. He argues that repeal of the Missouri Compromise logically allowed nullification of other things as well. Blames abolitionism. Argues that the South had to withdraw rather than work against Lincoln because eventually it would be outnumbered whatever it did. includes justification for "The exercise of the sovereign right of state revocation of its Grants and withdrawl from the union." Alfriend was author of The Life of Jefferson Davis.
Marked "Strictly Confidential" at the top. Written a few months after Davis' release from prison. Discusses his role in the Senate during the various attempts to compromise on the slavery issue in 1850 and the Crittenden Compromise of 1860. Davis claims to have been a Unionist and places the blame for secession on the Northern politicians who would not compromise. He also explains why Southern Congressmen did not remain in the Senate, in order to control the Lincoln administration, after their respective states seceded.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.