Burgoyne, John, 1722-1792 to William Heath
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC04764.51 Author/Creator: Burgoyne, John, 1722-1792 Place Written: Cambridge, Massachusetts Type: Autograph letter signed Date: January 12, 1778 Pagination: 5 p. : docket ; Height: 23.9 cm, Width: 17.7 cm Order a Copy
Written by General Burgoyne as commander of the captured British Convention Army to General Heath as commander of the district where the Convention Army is situated. References Heath's letter of 10 January 1778, where Heath expressed anger over abuses committed by British troops. Says he will respond to Heath's complaints later, because he does not want to be diverted from the matter of Colonel David Henley, the commandant of the Prospect Hill barracks accused of murder and abusing British troops, by "collateral matter." Says Heath was taking the matter with Henley in a slight and indifferent manner. Accuses Henley of "unprovoked" and "wanton" bloodshed in three instances. Claims Henley made himself "Judge and Executioner." Says will prove it with "incontestable evidence." Asks how Heath can put him off by a court of inquiry where neither judges nor witnesses will have to operate under oath. Complains that this incident should not be looked at in a court of inquiry, which has a specific legal meaning. Says the inquiry will be unfair without the use of an oath. Claims they are being held under "the sanction of a truce, and the publick faith is pledged for our safe conduct, by the universal law of Nations we have a right to personal protection." Formerly protests, in the name of Great Britain, against a court of inquiry and demands a court martial of Henley. Marked "No. 43" near docket.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.