Johnson, Andrew, 1808-1875 to Alfred O. Nicholson
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC04628 Author/Creator: Johnson, Andrew, 1808-1875 Place Written: Washington, District of Columbia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 18 January 1848 Pagination: 4 p. ; 25.6 x 20 cm. Order a Copy
Supports Lewis Cass' concept of popular sovereignty, enabling each new state to vote whether or not to allow slavery, believing that this is the best way to extend and protect slavery. "It seems to me for the south to admit that the federal Government has the power to establish slavery where it does not now, exist, (that is in the territories) is conceding all that the most ultr & Wilmot proviso man desires - for if the Government can establish, in slave territory now free, it can abollish it in a territory where it does exist...Our true position in my opinion, is, to deny all power to the Genl Government to interfere with the institution of Slavery in or out of the states, leaving it exclusively to the people, the legitimate source of all power, to determin the nature and character of all institutions that pertain to there particular locality - It is the safest position for the south it is the most defensible for the democracy of the north, while at the same time we steer clear of impracticable Taneyism on the one hand and Wilmot Provisoism on the other."
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.