Dick, Franklin Archibald, 1823-1885 to Charles Drake
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC04274 Author/Creator: Dick, Franklin Archibald, 1823-1885 Place Written: St. Louis, Missouri Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 12 June 1863 Pagination: 5 p. ; 25.5 x 20.5 cm ; 4 p. ; 32 x 20.5 cm. Order a Copy
Written as provost marshal of St. Louis. Replies to Drake's request for information concerning the Missouri congressional laws about emancipating slaves in compliance with the Emancipation Proclamation. Details General Orders no. 35, which instructed the provost marshals "to take testimony as to the acts of disloyal slave owners," and ascertain the facts. Explains that there is great opposition to the enforcement of the law. "...for the spirit of resistance to it amongst the Enrolled Militia, has left those officers nearly powerless in the absence of U.S. troops, and they being the first men who have attempted to execute a law of Congress in this State against slavery, have met with the combined opposition of all supporters of that institution." Includes his four page testimony proclaiming that slavery should be immediately abandoned in Missouri and giving a list of reasons why, including, "...for it is the Enemy of Every other interest in the state..." Pages vary in size; some with embossment at far left.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.