Slidell, John, 1793-1871 to Alfred Edmund Burr
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02925.18 Author/Creator: Slidell, John, 1793-1871 Place Written: Washington, District of Columbia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 12 March 1860 Pagination: 2 p. : docket ; Height: 24.5 cm, Width: 19.6 cm Order a Copy
Slidell, a United States Senator from Louisiana, regretfully declines an invitation from Burr, Chairman of the Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee, to speak at a canvass preceding the 1860 presidential election. States "The Democracy of Connecticut has long been distinguished for its bold & unflinching adherence to sound constitutional principles, your representatives in both branches of Congress have commanded the gratitude & admiration of every true Southern man ..." Declares "in the person of the gallant Seymour you have a standard bearer worthy of the great cause ..." (possibly referring to Thomas Hart Seymour, avid Democrat and Governor of Connecticut 1850-1853). Slidell served as a U.S. congressman (1843-1846) and senator (1853-1860). During the Civil War, Slidell served as Confederate minister to France. His 1861 arrest, with fellow ambassador James Mason, on the British ship Trent created a diplomatic breach between the U.S. and Britain.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.