Halleck, H.W. (Henry Wager), 1815-1872 to George B. McClellan
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02655 Author/Creator: Halleck, H.W. (Henry Wager), 1815-1872 Place Written: St. Louis, Missouri Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 10 March 1862 Pagination: 1 p. : docket Height: 22 cm, Width: 13 cm Order a Copy
Celebrates Union victory at the Battle of Pea Ridge, a major battle in the Trans-Mississippi. Relates that "The Army of the Southwest, under Genl Curtis, after three days hard fighting near Sugar Creek, Ark, has gained a most glorious victory over the combined forces of Van Dorn, McCulloch, Price & McIntosh." The Union army managed to repulse the attack, despite having been surprised by the Confederates. The Confederates are forced to leave Arkansas. McCulloch and McCintosh were killed during the battle. Claims that "Our loss in killed & wounded estimated at one thousand; that of the enemy still larger. Guns, flags, provisions, &c captured in large quantities. Our cavalry in pursuit of the flying enemy." In fact the Union lost over 1,384 men, while the Confederates lost only around 800. However, the Union held the position, which was the main objective. Written in pencil upon stationery of the Department of the Missouri. Signed as Major General.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.