Peirce, Joseph, 1745-1828 to Henry Knox
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02437.04957 Author/Creator: Peirce, Joseph, 1745-1828 Place Written: Boston, Massachusetts Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 24 May 1791 Pagination: 2 p. : address ; Height: 32.5 cm, Width: 20.1 cm Order a Copy
Written by Knox's agent Peirce to Secretary of War Knox. References Knox's letter of 16 May, which mentioned the insolvency of the estate. Is confident it is insolvent because the probate judge reported it so to the judges of the Supreme Court and because of advertisements in the newspapers. Says that Samuel Winslow reported to him that David Partridge, an occupant (possibly a squatter) of the Cooper Claim, was served a writ. On Winslow's advice he sent fifteen dollars to a Mr. Parsons to handle this issue, which will be tried in Portland in July. Peirce wrote to Winslow to find evidence of other occupants illegally selling land to pay for taxes. Believes that Knox and Henry Jackson will discuss the sale of the patent. Says Mr. [possibly Samuel Allyne] Otis declined giving a receipt for the papers on the Hampshire Lands. Says that Otis will return them after looking them over. Settled and received the bond and mortgage from the firm Westi & Coxes. (See GLC02437.04957 for related information.)
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.