Crawford, Samuel Wylie, 1829-1892 [Account of the surrender of Fort Sumter]
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC01127.03 Author/Creator: Crawford, Samuel Wylie, 1829-1892 Place Written: New York, New York Type: Autograph document signed Date: 13 May 1861 Pagination: 3 p. ; 21 x 26 cm. Order a Copy
Firsthand account of the negotiations for the surrender of Fort Sumter. Details conversation between Major Robert Anderson and Captain Lee negotiating terms of surrender. Finishes Crawford's narrative begun in GLC01127.01. Recounts the conversation between Captain Lee and Major Anderson. Anderson had already told Louis Wigfall he would surrender, but Wigfall was not actually sent by Beauregard. Lee was Beauregard's true emissary, and he and Anderson agreed on the official terms of surrender. Also lists men wounded on 13 April as Thomas Kernin, James Hays, and Edward Galloway, here spelled Galway, who it notes is now dead. These men were injured in an accident during the salute to the American flag. No one was killed during the actual battle over Fort Sumter. Signed by Crawford for himself and Captain Truman Seymour authenticating that this is a true account of events they witnessed. Collateral contains report relating to the authenticity of the handwriting.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.