Woodhull, Nathaniel, 1722-1776 [Warning that the British Army may attack New York, with resolution]
Order a pdf of this item here.
A high-resolution version of this object is available for registered users. LOG IN
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC07281 Author/Creator: Woodhull, Nathaniel, 1722-1776 Place Written: New York, New York Type: Manuscript document Date: 4 March 1776 Pagination: 1 p. : docket ; 29.5 x 18.3 cm. Order a Copy
True copy of the resolution, written and co-signed by Robert Benson as Secretary of the New York Provisional Congress. Contains secretarial signature of Woodhull as President of the Provincial Congress. This resolution was probably passed in fear of a British landing in New York after the presumed withdrawal of the British Army from Boston. (Henry Knox had brought the cannons from Fort Ticonderoga to Boston in mid-February 1776 and General Howe decided to evacuate Boston three days after this resolution was passed. The British left Boston on 17 March). Being cautious, the Provincial Congress asked that the colonels of the militia and minutemen in the area south of Albany have their units provisioned, armed, and ready to march at the first notice of an invasion. The resolution further demands that the colonels send a report on the present state of their regiments. It goes to say that if the minutemen only make up one quarter of their regiment, the unit is to filled out "agreeable to the Rules and orders of this Congress of the 20th of December last."
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.