Peirce, John, 1750-1798 to Henry Knox
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02437.03683 Author/Creator: Peirce, John, 1750-1798 Place Written: Richmond, Virginia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 27 October 1787 Pagination: 3 p. : address : docket ; Height: 22.4 cm, Width: 18.4 cm Order a Copy
Summarizes the proceedings of a committee of the Massachusetts House of Representatives called to consider ratification of the United States Constitution. Mentions proposals made by representatives to empower the committee to ratify the constitution and to make amendments, if necessary. Some representatives wished to make amendments "as they believed there were many very important Errors in it." A resolution was unanimously passed that "the plan of the national government of the U.S. as transmitted by Congress, ought to be submitted to a convention of the people, for their full, free & candid investigation and discussion." Reports on the structure of the convention, and declares that it will be held in Boston the following May. Adds that the local citizenry seem to be "almost universally favorable" to the constitution, but that representatives seem to be equally divided. This, apparently, is leading to a spirit of willingness to compromise. Lists some of the issues currently being discussed in the debates, such as how the new American system compares with the British parliamentary system. "Free" handwritten on address leaf with no signature.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.