Hunt, Henry Jackson, 1819-1889 to George Brinton McClellan
Order a pdf of this item here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02382.068 Author/Creator: Hunt, Henry Jackson, 1819-1889 Place Written: Atlanta, Georgia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 21 March 1880 Pagination: 4 p. : Height: 20.6 cm, Width: 25.3 cm Order a Copy
Mentions an article re the Battle of Antietam advertised in the 'North American Review.' Hunt discusses his conspiracy theory involving Stanton, McClellan and the Emancipation Proclamation. "…if you had lost Antietam you would have been shot [a hury?] - if a court could be packed for the purpose, and after a defeat such a court could have been got - After a victory, they were able to remove you and pack a court almost sufficient to shoot [a hurry?] Porter, and the spirit that prescripted it, is as then proceeding, in the Senate …as malignant an virulent as ever. You ran a terrible risk in that Maryland campaign. I was not aware of it at the time for I did not then know of the trap that was laid, although I was aware that you were obstructed so far as possible at every step…." Notes that the N.A. Review article accuses Stanton and Halleck of treachery regarding this supposed plot against McClellan. Claims the plot was aimed at preventing a great defeat of Lee's army in 1862, as conditions after such a victory would have led to an uprising that would have isolated Virginia. "Halleck & Stanton & the whole radical crew knew it and dreaded it. - until the Em. Proclamation should be issued - and the proclamation would hold the south together and deaden the opposition even of NC & Tenn to the Confederacy. But what cared the abolitionists for that!...."
Mentions an article by a Boutwell, also in the N.A.R. Writes that if a radical candidate is not elected at the polls, he is still declared elected. Claims planned election fraud, with a quid pro quo between Grant and Hayes & Wheeler.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.