 |
 |
|
|
|
|

|
|
 
|
George Washington to New Hampshire, 29 December 1777
(Detail, GLC03706)
|
|
|
North American Slavery in Comparative Perspective:
Address of John Brown to the Virginia Court
by Michael A. Vieira
Bishop Connolly High School, Fall River, MA
|
|

Gilder Lehrman Document GLC 05508.051
http://www.gilderlehrman.org/search/display_results.php?id=GLC05508.051

On October 16, 1859, John Brown led a party of approximately
21 men into Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. Encountering
no resistance, Brown’s men seized the federal arsenal,
an armory, and a rifle works. Brown then sent out several
detachments to round up hostages and liberate slaves.
As news of the raid spread, angry townspeople and local
militia companies cut off Brown’s escape routes
and trapped his men in the armory. Two days later, U.S.
Marines led by Colonel Robert E. Lee arrived at Harper's
Ferry. The marines stormed the arsenal. Five of Brown’s
party escaped, ten were killed, and seven, including Brown,
were taken as prisoner. A week later, Brown was put on
trial in Virginia court, even though his attack had occurred
on federal property. He was found guilty of treason, conspiracy,
and murder, and was sentenced to die on the gallows. The
trial's high point came at the end when Brown was allowed
to make a five-minute speech, which helped convince many
Northerners that Brown was a martyr to the cause of freedom.


I have, may it please the Court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny every thing but what I have
already admitted, of a design on my
part to free Slaves. I intended certainly, to have made
a clean thing of that matter, as I did
last winter, when I went into Missouri, and there took
Salves, without the snapping of a
gun on either side, moving then through the country, and
finally leaving them in Canada.
I was desired to have dome the same thing again, on a
much larger scale. That was all I
intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or destruction
of property, or to excite or
incite Slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.
I have another objection, and that is, that it is unjust
that I should suffer such a penalty.
Had I interfered in the manner, and which I admit has
fairly proved, for I admire the
truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the
witnesses who have testified in this
case – had I interfered in behalf of the Rich, the
Powerful, the Intelligent, the so-called
Great, or in behalf of any friends, either father, mother,
brother, sister, wife, or
children, or any that class, and suffered and sacrificed
what I have in this interference,
it would have been all right. Every man in this Court
would have deemed it an act
worthy a reward, rather than punishment.
Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my
life for the furtherance of the
ends of justice and MINGLE MY BLOOD FURTHER WITH THE BLOOD
OF MY
CHILDREN, and with the blood of millions in slave country
whose rights are disregarded
By the wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments – I
summit; so LET IT BE DONE.


1. Describe the tone of John Brown’s
Address to the Virginia Court.
2. What does Brown admit to? What does
he deny?
3. Why was he tried in a Virginia Court
and not a federal court?
4. Are Brown’s actions at Harper’s
Ferry justified? Explain your viewpoint.
5. Was Brown a martyr to the cause of
freedom or a domestic terrorist? Explain your view.


|
|
|
|