Grand Jury of Albany Presentation of inconveniences to Thomas Dongan
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC03107.01957 Author/Creator: Grand Jury of Albany Place Written: Albany, New York Type: Manuscript document Date: 1686 Pagination: 1p. : docket ; 32.3 x 21.1 cm Order a Copy
The people of Albany condemn the practice of conducting trade with Indians outside of the town, as it has led to a decline in the trade and wealth of Albany, and will eventuallly bring the town to ruin. They also note that great debauchery has resulted when the youth of Albany enter Indians' houses to conduct trade, and complain of the practice of giving gifts to Indians, which allows them to set the higher value on commodities. They also comment on the poor state of highways in an around Albany.
Thomas Dongan (1634-1715), 2nd Earl of Limerick was a member of Irish Parliament, Royalist military officer during the English Civil War, and governor of the Province of New York (1684-1688). He is noted for having called the first representative legislature in New York and granting the province's Charter of Liberties.
Wee the Grand Jurors for the [inserted: Towne &] County of Albany
doe humbly represent to the Consideration of this honble
these following inconveniensyes in order to their being
redress in such enamer as to yor hon.st shall seeme
equall concenient.
1. Wee doe finde that the greate liberty now taken on credence of hunteing [illegible] & the like to trade with the Indians [inserted: without ye town] is [illegible] of the greate decay of trade here & will if continued tend to the utter ruin of this class.
2. Wee doe finde that altho' there are many acts Cordts. against such tradeing without the Towne yett in regard of the difficulty of proveing it by Christian Evidence these acts come farr short of a sufficient remedy - Therefor wee would humbly recomend it to yor honrs. case as a thing very convenient that some provision may bee made that for the future yt upon the testimony of an Indian in the afirmative the early accused so to have transgressed may bee obliged to pursue himselfe by an oath otherwise the acusation taken & confesse.
3. Wee doe finde that great Debauchery happens amongst the youth by goeing to trade with the Indians in their houses.
4. Wee doe finde that greate inconveniencyes not only to our selves but strangers by the generall neglect there is of high wayes in some places quite slopt up in other & changed much to the disadvantage and allmost all wanteing repayre by clearing or the like.
5. Wee doe likewise finde that the giving of gifts to the Indians [struck: here] by particular persons thereby to oblige them to traffique with them is a greate wrong not only to the neighbour but to the publique also by occasioneing the Indians to sett the greater vallue upon their Comodityes doing such contention who shall have them -
Corn[elius] van dÿck [illegible]
The Coll Recomends the above Agrievances
to his honor the Governo.rs Consideration
P Cur: John Tudor [illegible]
[docket]
1686
Grand Juryes presentmt
Of Severall things
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.